The Vermont Voice Interview

May 15, 2012 in Audio Clips, Lowell, Press Coverage, Renewable Energy, Vermont Energy Projects by Stephen J. Maas

Vermont Voice Online at the Northland Journal

Audio from Eric & Steve’s interview with Scott Wheeler on his radio show The Vermont Voice, which aired on Sunday, 5/13/2012 on WIKE 1490 AM in Derby, VT can now be streamed from our media page.

Many thanks to Scott for his insightful profiling of our project; be sure to tune in to his shows whenever you’re able!

Mountaintop Protesters on The Northeast Kingdom Voice

May 13, 2012 in Lowell, Vermont Energy Projects, Wind by Stephen J. Maas

547961_10150797426756892_157608136891_9914912_1282787311_n

Via Scott Wheeler:

For more than 18 months a group of people have being “occupying” land near the construction of a wind power project in Lowell. They have been protesting the ongoing destruction the project is creating.

Next week’s guests on the Northeast Kingdom Voice television show are Steve Wright and Stacy Burke. They are members of the protest movement. The pair will talk about their group and what they stand for.

The Northeast Kingdom Voice, which is hosted by Scott Wheeler, the publisher of Vermont Northland Journal, airs every week on Channel 17 on Monday at 6 p.m., Tuesday at 9 a.m. and 7 p.m., and Wednesday at 7:30 p.m

We have interviewed Steve Wright for our film, and have run into Stacy Burke at various events that we have covered, as well.  This promises to be an interesting episode, if you can catch it.

State of Green on the Vermont Voice

May 11, 2012 in Press Coverage by Stephen J. Maas

Listen to The Vermont Voice Online at the Northland Journal

Scott Wheeler, historian and chronicler of all things Northeast Kingdom, has invited us to appear on his radio show, The Vermont Voice.

Our show will air this coming Sunday, 5/13/2012, at 7 AM on WIKE 1490 AM in Derby.  The shows are also posted to the Northland Journal website for online listening after the fact, and we’ll be posting a copy on our Media page at some point next week.

Back on the Ridge

May 9, 2012 in Lowell, Photos by Stephen J. Maas

Lowell Ridge, 05/2012

Its controversy aside, the ridge has awesome cell coverage.

It seems that we can’t stay away from Lowell.

Not that we are really trying.  We welcome every opportunity we get to climb up to the top of the ridge, from either side.  Each visit provides us with new insight, new information and new footage.  We have never walked away from a trip to the ridge with the feeling that the time we spent was anything short of extremely worth it.

When we first started collecting footage for this film, we knew Lowell would be a part of it.  We thought it would be one small piece in a larger puzzle, though, not the touchstone to which we continually return that it has become.  But that’s the way it goes when you make a documentary film following current events — the story tells itself; we just follow along.

Our website has been up for a while, but this entry marks a bit of a restart for us.  As we collect more and more footage and gain more and more insight to and experience in the unique energy situations in Vermont, our focus shifts.  So too must our online presence — our face to the world.  So here we are.

Stay tuned for many more updates as we begin this next leg of our journey.

U.S. Nuclear Plants vs. Fault Lines

March 22, 2011 in Education, Nuclear by Stephen J. Maas

Repost from shortformblog:

tumblr_li9ysymjkf1qas8z9o1_r2_500

GRAPHIC: Examining U.S. nuclear reactor/fault line geography

Some nuclear power food for thought: A lot of tumult has been taking place here in America over the nuclear crisis unfolding in Japan. This has ranged from rational concerns (this model of reactor seems unsafe!) to the not-so-rational ones (I need to buy potassium iodide RIGHT NOW!). With that in mind, we’ve decided to focus on a simple, practically important question; if the Mark 1 Reactor is indeed inferior on safety, where are ours and are they earthquake safe? The map tells the tale: 23 plants are presently using a Mark 1, all of which are in the eastern half of the country. (h/t to the USGS, Reuters and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the sources of the maps we used). source

Have you ever wondered…

February 18, 2011 in Conservation, Education by Stephen J. Maas

How much CO2 is created by…

6 eggs?

A year of cell phone calls?

Sending an email?

Brazil?

The answers are here.  (Flash required)

Every action, every event, every person, everything emits a certain amount of carbon. This interactive visualization examines some of those scenarios. Play around to learn some interesting and surprising information about how much carbon is released during various activities.

Shumlin Wants To Identify Off-Limits Wind Areas

February 15, 2011 in Policy, Renewable Energy, Vermont Energy Projects, Wind by Stephen J. Maas

The Shumlin administration hopes to ease some of the controversy over wind energy by identifying what areas should be off limits to energy developers.

As VPR’s John Dillon reports, the administration’s plan is not the comprehensive siting process that some environmentalists had called for.   (www.vpr.net)

Does this mean that once the areas that are off-limits are determined, the rest of the state is fair game?  Is that the best way to go about designing our wind energy future?

Annette Smith, of Vermonters for a Clean Environment and someone on our short list for interviewees for the film, is not pleased:

All I asked for is a seat at the table. We have not had anybody interested in listening to us about what a process would look like…Allowing the Agency of Natural Resources secretary to make this decision about where projects should or shouldn’t go, it completely ignores the human side of it. We are now apparently in a realm where we can mitigate the impact on the bears but the human species are being tossed out.” (www.vpr.net)

Which way will the wind blow?  (Sorry.)

What is Tritium?

February 1, 2011 in Nuclear by Stephen J. Maas

With all of the discussion regarding the tritium leaks at Vermont Yankee of late, I found myself wondering what the substance is, exactly.  I assumed it was radioactive, but how harmful is it, in fact?  What are the regulatory limits that define how much is too much?  What exactly happens when it enters our groundwater?

Naturally, I started with Wikipedia, where I quickly found the following information:

The legal limits for tritium in drinking water vary from country-to-country and from continent-to-continent. Some figures are given below.

  • Canada: 7,000 becquerel per liter (Bq/L).
  • United States: 740 Bq/L or 20,000 picocurie per liter (pCi/L) (Safe Drinking Water Act)
  • World Health Organization: 10,000 Bq/L.
  • European Union: “investigative” limit of 100 Bq/L.

(A becquerel and a curie, it turns out, are both units of radioactivity, named after Henri Becquerel and Marie and Pierre Curie respectively.  “pico” denotes a factor of 10-2).

What first jumps out at me is that the limits vary heavily.  And the US standard is extremely far below the WHO limit.  For some reason this surprises me.

So what levels were found at Vermont Yankee?  The Burlington Free Press reports that the most recent find was “1,024 picocuries per liter of tritium” according to VY, and 9,000 picocuries in the previous contaminated well find.  If we compare that to the regulatory limits, we see that as far as picocuries go, the levels don’t seem that high.  Indeed, they are far below “the one with much higher levels — in the millions of picocuries per liter — reported a year ago outside the advanced off-gas building.”

How, exactly, a picocurie compares to a becquerel is a little beyond my limited knowledge of nuclear physics and rudimentary browsing skills – on Wikipedia, of all places, the validity of which is often debated.  I’m also not certain whether the levels found in the wells that are being tested at VY have any correlation to drinking water per se.  Maybe it is “okay” to have high levels in the ground as long as it is dispersed enough before entering the actual drinking water system?  Clearly it is alarming to find anything radioactive in our ground whatsoever.  But while it is a radiation hazard if ingested, Wikipedia, for what it is worth, goes on to state that tritium has “a short biological half life in the human body of seven to 14 days, which both reduces the total effects of single-incident ingestion and precludes long-term bioaccumulation of [tritiated water] from the environment.”

Sure would be nice to have a layman’s explanation for what these tritium findings really mean to the environment and human bodies.  Post a comment if you have any leads.

VPR Examines Wind Power All This Week

February 1, 2011 in Events, Lowell, Renewable Energy, Vermont Energy Projects, Wind by Stephen J. Maas

In connection with the Public Service Board hearings that are now opening for Kingdom Community Wind in Lowell – a project that would be Vermont’s largest wind development site by far if it is completed – Vermont Public Radio is producing stories focusing on wind energy in Vermont, every day this week.   Be sure to tune in to hear what promise to be some unique stories!  We’ll be following them with great interest.

Today, John Dillon spoke with Don Nelson, who claims his barn was set on fire by arsonists who were responding to his opposition to the wind power development in his town.  Read or listen to the full story here.

If you know Don Nelson personally, please drop us a line – we are interested in interviewing him for the film.

Shumlin Responds to IBM Power Concerns

January 31, 2011 in Nuclear, Policy by Stephen J. Maas

Vermont’s biggest employers and their employees are watching. IBM officials spelled it out before a Senate committee this week saying Big Blue spends $35 million a year on energy costs at the Essex Junction plant and shutting Vermont Yankee down could cost them another $8 million per year.

“So if we are going to be in these markets, we have to be cost competitive or we won’t be here,” IBM’s Jeanette Bombardier told lawmakers Wednesday.

The governor did not read that message as a signal IBM could leave Vermont.

“As I read it, they need to be competitive and if they are not, the statement I read was we are out of here– meaning we are out of business, not that we are moving somewhere else. Having said that this is incredibly important,” Shumlin said.  (From WCAX.com)